| Modifications proposed to Florida building
code.
The International Hurricane Protection Association’s (IHPA) code
consultant, Joe Belcher, JDB Code Services, Inc., has submitted several
proposed modifications to the 2006 Annual Interim Code Amendments to the
2004 Florida Building Code. The modifications were submitted to the Technical
Advisory Committee, as the topics involved its area of responsibility.
The proposals are modifications to the residential code involving hurricane
protection panels and shutters and emergency escape and garages, required
inspections, permitting and testing.
The proposed modification to Section 1008.1.3.6 of the code would allow
a means of escape to be located in a garage providing it has a side hinged
door leading directly to the exterior. Currently, the temporary installation
or closure of storm shutters, panels and other approved hurricane protection
devices are permitted on emergency escape and rescue openings in Group
R occupancies during the threat of a storm as long as at least one means
of escape from the dwelling or dwelling unit is provided. That means of
escape, under the current code, must be within the first floor of the
dwelling or dwelling unit and cannot be located within a garage.
This prohibition, the proposed modification says, does not take into account
the presence of side hinged doors leading directly to the exterior. While
rolling overhead doors may pose a problem during a storm, side hinged
doors would provide a safer passage than panels requiring unscrewing and
removal from the inside and providing a minimal space for passage.
Making this change would not have a fiscal impact on code enforcement
as it merely expands the allowable means of escape and should result in
a reduction in cost to building and property owners as it will allow for
the use of a new or existing side hinged door leading from a garage directly
to the exterior.
A proposed modification to Section 109.3 adds hurricane protection devises
to the list of building components that must be included during required
framing inspections. Currently, window/door framing, vertical cells/columns,
lintel/tie beams, framing/trusses/bracing connectors, draft stopping/fire
blocking, curtain wall framing and energy insulation are included.
Hurricane protection devices are an important aspect in maintaining structural
integrity during a hurricane event, the proposed modification states.
In addition to increasing the structural performance of buildings, they
play a role in the life safety of the people weathering out the storm
in the building. These installations should be inspected to meet the standards
adopted for these devices and permits for these important structural safeguards
and life safety devices should be required.
On the subject of permits, a proposed modification to section 105.1 would
include the installation of hurricane protection devices in permits for
new construction and not require a separate permit.
This change may result in an increase in the cost of the permit, as those
costs will be passed on to the consumer, the proposal admits. But the
benefit of the requirement will far outweigh the cost in increased assurance
that these important structural and life safety protection devices are
properly designed and installed. It also protects homeowners and homebuilders
from cases of substandard materials, inappropriate testing or claims of
testing, and improper installation of products. The closer scrutiny of
the design and installation of hurricane protection devices will result
in greater protection to the public and a better value to the consumer.
The proposed modification to Section 1609.1.4; R301.2.1.2 spells out testing
standards, saying hurricane protection coverings shall be tested at 1.5
times the design pressure (positive or negative) expressed in pounds per
square feet as determined by the Florida Building Code, Building Section
1609 for which the specimen is to be tested.
This modification, the proposal states, strengthens the code by clearly
establishing the factor of safety for design pressures to be used in the
testing of hurricane protection devices. The current codes and test standards
are silent on these points. The recommended language has been an industry
standard and is taken from TAS 202 and used in Miami-Dade and Broward
Counties for a number of years with satisfactory results.
|